Currently viewing the tag: "Climate Change"

by Christopher Mims. For the next couple of years, Obama is playing defense on climate change, and that could explain the fairly tame energy policy he announced yesterday, says Ezra Klein of The Washington Post . Like the Kung-Fu masters of yore, he knows that he cannot hope to defeat his opponents in a frontal assault. These are, after all, politicians who would strip the EPA of even its existing power to regulate greenhouse gases, so there’s no way in hell they’d vote for strong action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Rather, he’s got to bend like the reed. If he puts forth a bold plan to, for example, put a price on carbon, it could reduce his chances of re-election, and then he’s of no use to anyone who cares about action on climate change.

4b79d07b13uj0fAw.gif Is Obamas weak sauce energy policy just savvy political Kung Fu?

See the original post here:
Is Obama’s weak-sauce energy policy just savvy political Kung-Fu?

There is a climate science hearing trial today at 10 am of the full House Science Committee, “Climate Change: Examining the Processes Used to Create Science and Policy” (webcast here ). The Charter ( here ) makes clear this is a Scopes-like trial of Climategate, since it has an extended discussion of the stolen e-mails (which it claims were “leaked” — as if) along with innuendo-laden treatments of “Data Quality” and the “IPCC process.”  The Charter never mentions the multiple vindications of the scientists whose emails were stolen and of the IPCC itself — and it omits any discussion of the massive amount of data and independent analyses that underpin our understanding of climate science.  And those phony attacks  are then used to question EPA’s rather obvious finding that unrestricted emissions of greenhouse gases are a danger to the health and well-being of Americans. The fossil fuel funded Tea Party and climate zombies of the GOP have turned it into the party of no science — see Tim Pawlenty: “Every one of us” running for president has flip-flopped on climate change and National Journal : “The GOP is stampeding toward an absolutist rejection of climate science that appears unmatched among major political parties around the globe, even conservative ones.” So rather than calling this the Scopes trial, let’s just call it the Nopes trial. The Democrats were allowed one witness and invited a serious climate scientist, MIT’s Kerry Emanuel.  The GOP had five witnesses and invited 3 non-scientists to spread disinformation on greenhouse gas regulations and costs.  Of the two actual scientists they invited, Richard Muller and John Christy, only one is actually a climate scientist.  Christy, though, is also a serial disinformer.  Skeptical Science debunked point by point his last testimony (see “ Should you believe anything John Christy says? “).  For more, see House GOP line up the usual disinformers for climate science hearing . Muller likes to claim he is an independent, apolitical physicist trying to restore “credibility” to the temperature record.  But in fact, like Christy, the Koch-funded Muller has also launched phony attacks on climate science for years (see here ).  Like Christy, Muller is a serial disinformer, as we’ve seen (see “ Koch-funded scientist Richard Muller makes up story about Al Gore, Ralph Cicerone, and polar bears “).  Indeed, Skeptical Science has begun a multipart debunking of Muller, which I repost below: [ Note:  SkS accuses Mueller of "misinformation" -- but the charge below has been debunked so many times in the past two years, including by the independent commissions reviewing the emails -- that it must now qualify as disinformation.  Willful ignorance of the facts -- like ignorance of the law -- is no defense. ] The most cited ‘ Climategate ‘ email is one from Phil Jones discussing a graph he produced for a World Meteorological Organization (WMO) report, where he discusses “Mike’s trick” and “hide the decline”

24923c5a16small.gif 100x46 GOP’s only scientists at ‘Scopes’ climate hearing are Richard Muller and John Christy.  Go figure!   Skeptical Science debunks more Muller...

View original post here:
GOP’s only scientists at ‘Scopes’ climate hearing are Richard Muller and John Christy. Go figure! – Skeptical Science debunks more Muller…

Tagged with:
 

Canada is one of the friendliest countries on Earth. They are liberal, open, incredibly helpful if you are lost, well educated and tolerant.And they come with a great sense of humor. So why has their record on climate change been awful in the last few years and will this change after the next election ? Was Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister and head of the minority government really a climate change denier in disguise? In the last election Stephane Dion, Liberal leader built his campaign on action on climate change but he was savaged by Harper and others and quit …

View original post here:
Canadian Government Falls -Good news ?

American journalist Mark Hertsgaard

Top News: Efforts to cool down the overheating reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant continue. Demonstrations across Spain calling for closure of nuclear plants. Protestors get jail sentences for peaceful climate action. Copyright unknown #Japan: Efforts to cool down the overheating reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant continue. IAEA has today confirmed that the level of nuclear accident at Fukushima has been raised to 5 (on the scale of 7 points, with Chernobyl representing the 7 on the scale). French nuclear authorities have been rating it as a 6 for several days.

Go here to read the rest:
Daily News: On problems with nuclear and free speech